The Port of Los Angeles was wrong to give a contract for security equipment to a Chinese Company in the first place. It was right to take a second look at the matter. It is now wrong to give the issue a third round of decision making. All of this confusion relates directly to the lack of guidelines by the Department of Homeland Security. The most important factor in purchasing security equipment should be that it’s not coming from a potential enemy. That should exclude Chinese security equipment. The fact that the President of China’s son is part of this deal indicates that the whole deal deserves a great deal more scrutiny. I would suggest that the Port of Los Angeles start all over again and this time exclude consideration for security equipment manufactured by a potential national security threat like China.
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
-
Links
You are absolutely correct. The Port of Los Angeles needs to rethink their present negotiations with new reasoning focusing on global threats which should already be at the top of their list.
Potential enemies must not be considered in manufacuturing our security equipment.
I wish more Congressmen in Washington had your insight and perspective regarding these matters.